IOPList.Org

By Natali_Mis/Shutterstock



FDA and Pfizer Knew COVID Shot
Caused Immunosuppression



By Joseph Mercola
April 14, 2022
Updated: April 17, 2022



April 1, 2022, another batch of 11,000 Pfizer documents were released
by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Pfizer trial data reveal natural
immunity was as effective as the jab, and that shot side effects were more
severe in those under 55.








With another batch of 11,000 Pfizer documents, released April 1, 2022, old suspicions
have gained fresh support. As reported by “Rising” cohost Kim Iversen (video above),
the first bombshell revelation is that natural immunity works,
and Pfizer has known it all along.

The clinical trial data showed there was no difference in outcomes between those with
previous COVID infection and those who got the shot. Neither group experienced
severe infection. Natural immunity was also statistically identical to the shot in
terms of the risk of infection.


Younger Adults More Likely to Experience Side Effects


The second revelation is that side effects from the shots were more severe in
younger people, aged 18 to 55, than those aged 55 and older.
(The risk of side effects also increased with additional doses, so the risk was
higher after the second dose than the first.)

As many of us have said all along, the risk of severe COVID is dramatically
lower in younger people than those over 60, which makes an elevated
risk of side effects unacceptable.

As noted by The Naked Emperor on Substack,[1] “with a vaccine that is producing
more frequent and more severe reactions and adverse events in younger individuals,
the vaccine should have been restricted to those who were actually at risk
of severe COVID-19.”


Pfizer Documents Show High Rate of Myocarditis


Interestingly, Pfizer’s documentation also includes medical information that mainstream media
and fact checkers have labeled as misinformation or disinformation. A pediatric consent form
lists several possible side effects, including a myocarditis rate of 10 in 100,000 — far greater
than the 1 in 50,000 (i.e., 2 in 100,000) rate previously reported.

We also know that myocarditis is far more frequent in young males, so for them, the risk is
significantly higher than 10 in 100,000, as they make up the bulk of these injuries.



Antibody-Dependent Enhancement Has Not Been Ruled Out



Many who have warned about the possibility of mRNA shots causing antibody-dependent
enhancement (ADE) — a situation in which you end up being more susceptible to serious
infection than you would have been otherwise — have been smeared and demonized by
media and labeled as disinformation spreaders.

Yet Pfizer’s own consent form clearly states: “Although not seen to date, it cannot yet be
ruled out that the studied vaccine can make a later COVID-19 illness more severe.”
As noted by Iversen, if ADE truly was of no concern at all, the consent form would not include it.
Yet there it is.

Vaccine-associated enhanced disease (VAED) is also listed as an “Important Potential Risk”
in Table 5 on page 11 of a document called
“5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Reports [2].”


As of February 28, 2021, Pfizer had 138 cases of suspected VAED, 75 of which were severe,
resulting in hospitalization, disability, life-threatening consequences or death; a total of 38
cases turned out to be lethal and 65 remained unresolved.[3][4]

Moreover, as noted by the Daily Expose,[5] “Phase 3 clinical trials are designed to uncover
frequent or severe side effects before a vaccine is approved for use, including ADE.
But herein lies the problem, [because] none of the COVID-19 vaccines have
completed Phase 3 trials.”

Pfizer’s Phase 3 trial is due to be completed February 8, 2024[6]— nearly two years
from now! Despite that, Pfizer concluded in its FDA submission that
“None of the 75 cases could be definitively considered as VAED.”


“[H]ow on earth could they not definitively conclude that
VAED was to blame when 75% of the confirmed ‘break-through’
cases reported to them were severe disease resulting in
hospitalization, disability, life-threatening consequences of death?”
The Daily Expose asks.[7]


Pfizer Knew About Immunosuppression

Another revealing statement found in the documents is this:

“Clinical laboratory evaluation showed a transient decrease in
lymphocytes that was observed in all age and dose groups after
Dose 1, which resolved within approximately one week …”


In other words, Pfizer knew that, in the first week after the shot, people of all ages
experienced transient immunosuppression, or put another way, a temporary weakening
of the immune system, after the first dose.

As noted by Iversen, this may have skewed infection rates, as people were not
considered partially vaccinated until 14 days after their first shot,11 and officially
fully vaccinated two weeks after the second dose.

If people are susceptible to infection during that first week, yet are counted as
unvaccinated during that time, this makes it appear as though the unvaccinated
are more prone to infection when that’s simply not true. Pfizer’s own trial showed
infection was significantly more common in the vaccine group than the placebo
group — 409 versus 287 — within the first seven days of the jab.


Fully Vaxxed Are More Likely to Die From COVID


The fact that Pfizer and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration were aware the shot
caused immunosuppression is incriminating, now that U.K. government data show that,
compared to the unvaccinated, those who have received two doses are:[8]





The Pfizer documents admit there was a temporary drop in immune function after the
first dose, but the real-world data showing an increased risk of severe infection and
death due to COVID among the double jabbed suggest ADE may indeed be at play
later on as well.

The chart below, created by the Daily Expose,[9] using data from the UKHSA
Vaccine Surveillance Report for week 13, 2022[10] (pages 40 and 45), reveals
who’s more likely to get COVID. And the infection rate for triple-vaxxed is even
higher than the double vaxxed







he next chart was created by the Daily Expose[11] using data from pages 41 and 45,
comparing COVID hospitalization rates.








And, finally, there is a comparison of the death rates, based on pages 44 and 45 of the
UKHSA Vaccine Surveillance Report for week 13, 2022.[12] Anyone over the age of 40
who has been double jabbed is now more likely to die of COVID than an unvaccinated
person of the same age.








Negative Vaccine Effectiveness in the Real World

The Daily Expose goes on to calculate and graph the real-world effectiveness rate of
the COVID jab, and it’s dire news:[13]



“If the rates per 100,000 are higher among the vaccinated,
which they are, then this means the COVID-19 injections are
proving to have a negative effectiveness in the real-world.
And by using Pfizer’s vaccine effectiveness formula we can
accurately decipher what the real-world effectiveness among
each age group actually is.

Pfizer’s vaccine formula: Unvaccinated Rate per 100k –
Vaccinated Rate per 100k / Unvaccinated
Rate per 100k x 100 = Vaccine Effectiveness …

This data shows that all double vaccinated people over age 18
are between 2 and 3 times more likely to be infected, with a
minus-87% vaccine effectiveness among 18 to 29 year olds,
and a minus-178% vaccine effectiveness among the over 80’s.

[A]ll double vaccinated people over age 30 are between 0.2
and 2 times more likely to be hospitalized, with a minus-1% vaccine
effectiveness among 30 to 39 year olds, and a minus-76% vaccine
effectiveness among the over 80’s.

The following chart shows the real world COVID-19 vaccine
effectiveness against death among the double vaccinated
population in England, based on the death rates provided above

[A]ll double vaccinated people over age 40 are between 2 and 3 times
more likely to die of COVID-19, with a minus-90% vaccine effectiveness
among 30 to 39 year olds, and a minus-156% vaccine effectiveness
among the over 80’s.”







Pfizer Hired 600 to Process Unprecedented Report Load

For the last two years, we’ve been keeping an eye on the U.S. Vaccine Adverse
Events Reporting System (VAERS), shaking our heads in disbelief as the numbers
shot up by the hundreds every single week, rapidly outpacing injuries for every
other vaccine combined over the past 32 years.[14]

As of March 25, 2022, there were 1,205,753 COVID jab-related reports,
including 145,781 hospitalizations and 26,396 deaths.[15] There has never been
a medical product in modern history that can compare. Nothing has been as
injurious and lethal as these experimental injections.

Between December 2020 and the end of February 2021, Pfizer shipped out
126,212,580 doses of its mRNA jab worldwide. Divided by 158,000 side effects,
we get an adverse event rate per dose of nearly 1:800,[16]
which is just crazy irresponsible.

In an earlier batch of documents, we learned Pfizer received 42,086 case reports
containing a total of 158,893 events in the first three months of the rollout.
In that release, the number of doses shipped was redacted, but in the April 1, 2022,
release, it was left unredacted, which means we can now calculate the
rate of adverse events reported to Pfizer in those first three months.

We now also have documentation showing Pfizer, by the end of February 2021,
had hired 600 additional full-time employees to process the unprecedented influx
of adverse event reports, and they predicted that by the end of June 2021,
they’d end up hiring more than 1,800.[17]

In the end, the COVID jab will go down in history as the biggest medical malfeasance
ever to occur with the willing participation of both drug companies and regulatory
agencies. And there’s no end in sight.

In March 2022, the FDA went ahead and authorized doses 4 and 5, based on a
preprint study[18][19] that found a fourth Moderna shot was 11% effective and
caused side effects in 40% of recipients, and a fourth Pfizer shot was 30% effective
and caused side effects in 80% of people.


I’m not sure what it’ll take for this public health nightmare to end and for the
responsible parties to be held to account for their criminal negligence, but apparently,
we’ve not hit critical mass outrage yet.


Originally published April 14, 2022 on Mercola.com



Sources and References