Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Mystery In Wuhan: Recovered Coronavirus Patients Test Negative ... Then Positive
#1
Mystery In Wuhan: 
Recovered Coronavirus Patients Test Negative ... Then Positive

March 27, 20209:28 AM ET

[Image: gettyimages-1207338403-50_custom-6a61ff8...00-c85.jpg]
People in Wuhan, China, line up at a facility that tests discharged COVID-19 
patients as well as individuals who had been held in isolation.

Feature China/Barcroft Media via Getty Images


A spate of mysterious second-time infections is calling into 
question the accuracy of COVID-19 diagnostic tools even as 
China prepares to lift quarantine measures to allow residents 
to leave the epicenter of its outbreak next month. It's also 
raising concerns of a possible second wave of cases.

From March 18-22, the Chinese city of Wuhan reported 
no new cases of the virus through domestic transmission — 
that is, infection passed on from one person to another. 
The achievement was seen as a turning point in efforts to 
contain the virus, which has infected more than 80,000 
people in China. Wuhan was particularly hard-hit, with 
more than half of all confirmed cases in the country.

But some Wuhan residents who had tested positive earlier 
and then recovered from the disease are testing positive 
for the virus a second time. Based on data from several 
quarantine facilities in the city, which house patients for 
further observation after their discharge from hospitals, 
about 5%-10% of patients pronounced "recovered" have 
tested positive again.

Some of those who retested positive appear to be 
asymptomatic carriers — those who carry the virus and 
are possibly infectious but do not exhibit any of the illness's 
associated symptoms — suggesting that the outbreak in 
Wuhan is not close to being over.


NPR has spoken by phone or exchanged text messages with 
four individuals in Wuhan who are part of this group of 
individuals testing positive a second time in March. 
All four said they had been sickened with the virus and 
tested positive, then were released from medical care in 
recent weeks after their condition improved and 
they tested negative.

Two of them are front-line doctors who were sickened 
after treating patients in their Wuhan hospitals. 
The other two are Wuhan residents. They all requested 
anonymity when speaking with NPR because those 
who have challenged the government's handling of 
the outbreak have been detained.

One of the Wuhan residents who spoke to NPR exhibited 
severe symptoms during their first round of illness and 
was eventually hospitalized. The second resident 
displayed only mild symptoms at firstand was quarantined 
in one of more than a dozen makeshift treatment 
centers erected in Wuhan during the peak of the outbreak.

But when both were tested a second time for the coronavirus 
on Sunday, March 22, as a precondition for seeking 
medical care for unrelated health issues, they tested positive 
for the coronavirus even though they exhibited none of the 
typical symptoms, such as a fever or dry cough. 
The time from their recovery and release to the retest 
ranged from a few days to a few weeks.

Could that second positive test mean a second round of infection? 
Virologists think it is unlikely that a COVID-19 patient could be 
re-infected so quickly after recovery but caution that it is 
too soon to know.

Under its newest COVID-19 prevention guidelines, 
China does not include in its overall daily count for total 
and for new cases those who retest positive after being 
released from medical care. China also does not include 
asymptomatic cases in case counts.

"I have no idea why the authorities choose not to 
count [asymptomatic] cases in the official case count. 
I am baffled," said one of the Wuhan doctors who had a 
second positive test after recovering.

These four people are now being isolated under medical 
observation. It is unclear whether they are infectious and 
why they tested positive after their earlier negative test.

It is possible they were first given a false negative test result, 
which can happen if the swab used to collect samples of the 
virus misses bits of the virus. Dr. Li Wenliang, a whistleblowing 
doctor who later died of the virus himself in February, 
tested negative for the coronavirus several times before 
being accurately diagnosed.

In February, Wang Chen, a director at the state-run 
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, estimated that the 
nucleic acid tests used in China were accurate at identifying 
positive cases of the coronavirus only 30%-50% of the time.

Another theory is that, because the test amplifies tiny bits 
of DNA, residual virus from the initial infection could have 
falsely resulted in that second positive reading.

"There are false positives with these types of tests," 
Dr. Jeffrey Shaman, a professor of environmental health 
sciences at Columbia University, told NPR by email. 
Shaman recently co-authored a modeling study showing 
that transmission by individuals who did not exhibit any 
symptoms was a driver of the Wuhan outbreak.

How real is China's recovery?

On Tuesday, Hubei province, where Wuhan is the capital, 
said it would relax lockdown measures that have now been 
in place for more than two months and begin letting residents 
leave cities the following day. Wuhan said it would begin 
lifting its quarantine measures and letting residents leave 
two weeks later, on April 8.

To leave Wuhan, residents must first test negative for the 
coronavirus, according to municipal authorities. Such screenings 
will identify some remaining asymptomatic virus carriers. 
But the high rate of false negatives that Chinese doctors 
have cited means many with the virus could pass undetected.

Last Thursday, Wuhan reported for the first time since the 
outbreak began that it had no new cases of the virus from 
the day before — a milestone in China's virus containment efforts. 
The city reported a zero rise in new cases for the following four days.


Assessing asymptomatic carriers

But Caixin, an independent Chinese news outlet, reported 
earlier this week that Wuhan hospitals were continuing to see 
new cases of asymptomatic virus carriers, citing a health official 
who said he had seen up to a dozen such cases a day.

Responding to inquiries about how the city was counting 
asymptomatic cases, Wuhan's health commission said Monday 
that it is quarantining new asymptomatic patients in specialized 
wards for 14 days. Such patients would be included in new 
daily case counts if they develop symptoms during that time, 
authorities said.

"Based on available World Health Organization data, new 
infections are mainly transmitted by patients who have developed 
symptoms. Hence [asymptomatic cases] may not be the 
main source of transmission," the commission said.

A researcher at China's health commission told reporters 
Tuesday that asymptomatic carriers "would not cause the 
spread" of the virus. Zunyou Wu, the researcher, explained 
this was because the authorities were isolating people who 
had close contact with confirmed patients. Wu did not explain 
how they would identify asymptomatic carriers who had no 
close contact with confirmed patients.

Addressing growing public concern of asymptomatic patients, 
China's Premier Li Keqiang urged during Thursday's senior-level 
government meeting that "relevant departments must ... 
truthfully, timely, and openly" answer questions, such as 
whether these patients are infectious and how the course of 
the outbreak may change.

Research suggests that the spread can be caused by 
asymptomatic carriers. Studies of patients from Wuhan 
and other Chinese cities who were diagnosed early in the outbreak 
suggest that asymptomatic carriers of the virus can infect those 
they have close contact with, such as family members.

"In terms of those who retested positive, the official party line 
is that they have not been proven to be infectious. That is not 
the same as saying they are not infectious," one of the Wuhan 
doctors who tested positive twice told NPR. He is now isolated 
and under medical observation. "If they really are not infectious," 
the doctor said, "then there would be no need to take them 
back to the hospitals again."



Geoff Brumfiel contributed reporting from Washington, D.C.
Semper Fidelis

[Image: SyAa0qj.png]

USMC
Nemo me impune lacessit
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)