Hey all

[Charon]

RC sites are research chemicals. One is to do them as research only. Of course they made chemicals that were lethal to many. One year at Christmas, a fellow forum lost several several good people whom had no idea how dangerous RCs can be. they are legally problematic. We have very few threads on them any more. Nor do we want anything that attracts the eyes of LE.

Amazon openly sold tylenol #3 for a tad bit. Then, PETA, for reasons unknown, broke into labs supplying amazon. and replaced the codeine with seroquel. That could kill someone elderly or with dementia or on certain meds. So PEtA fecked that up for all.

When u deal with an open format, like EBAy, yes, people make offers. They can be scammers and they could be Law. The first place attorneys are taught to get info on a person is to check their social media. LE reads online all the time. They even put out warnings that they are omnipresent now as this virus is bringing criminals online earlier and worse than usual.

Ok. BTW, u don't have to show up here often. No mandatory requirements. At this time.

[Igloo]

RC sites are research chemicals. One is to do them as research only. Of course they made chemicals that were lethal to many. One year at Christmas, a fellow forum lost several several good people whom had no idea how dangerous RCs can be.  they are legally problematic.  We have very few threads on them any more. Nor do we want anything that attracts the eyes of LE.

Amazon openly sold tylenol #3 for a tad bit.  Then, PETA, for reasons unknown, broke into labs supplying amazon. and replaced the codeine with seroquel.  That could kill someone elderly or with dementia or on certain meds.  So PEtA fecked that up for all.

When u deal with an open format, like EBAy, yes, people make offers. They can be scammers and they could be Law. The first place attorneys are taught to get info on a person is to check their social media. LE reads online all the time.  They even put out warnings that they are omnipresent now as this virus is bringing criminals online earlier and worse than usual. 

Ok. BTW, u don't have to show up here often. No mandatory requirements. At this time.

Oh yes, I actually suddenly realized shortly after posting that RC probably meant R Chems. Then I discovered you could only edit posts before 10 mins had passed - whoops! :P

I was also wondering about mandatory requirements. I have seen you reference needing to make 50 posts in on-topic areas within 100 days, or else getting your account deactivated. For example, in the Important Announcements thread https://www.ioplist.org/showthread.php?t...9#pid43379 and also in other posts of the forum, such as https://www.ioplist.org/showthread.php?t...9#pid88849

This isn't listed in the Board Rules thread though https://www.ioplist.org/showthread.php?tid=1 So, is it just an old rule or something?

---

RC sites are research chemicals. One is to do them as research only. Of course they made chemicals that were lethal to many. One year at Christmas, a fellow forum lost several several good people whom had no idea how dangerous RCs can be.  they are legally problematic.  We have very few threads on them any more. Nor do we want anything that attracts the eyes of LE.

Amazon openly sold tylenol #3 for a tad bit.  Then, PETA, for reasons unknown, broke into labs supplying amazon. and replaced the codeine with seroquel.  That could kill someone elderly or with dementia or on certain meds.  So PEtA fecked that up for all.

When u deal with an open format, like EBAy, yes, people make offers. They can be scammers and they could be Law. The first place attorneys are taught to get info on a person is to check their social media. LE reads online all the time.  They even put out warnings that they are omnipresent now as this virus is bringing criminals online earlier and worse than usual. 

Ok. BTW, u don't have to show up here often. No mandatory requirements. At this time.

Oh yes, I actually suddenly realized shortly after posting that RC probably meant R Chems. Then I discovered you could only edit posts before 10 mins had passed - whoops! :P

I was also wondering about mandatory requirements. I have seen you reference needing to make 50 posts in on-topic areas within 100 days, or else getting your account deactivated. For example, in the Important Announcements thread https://www.ioplist.org/showthread.php?t...9#pid43379 and also in other posts of the forum, such as https://www.ioplist.org/showthread.php?t...9#pid88849

This isn't listed in the Board Rules thread though https://www.ioplist.org/showthread.php?tid=1 So, is it just an old rule or something?

---

(Sorry for the double post) Is there a rule about double posting by the way Charon?

But yes, I just want to apologize for somehow messing up the above post. I tried to edit prior to the 10 min limit, but then the 10 mins passed whilst still in the editing mode and then the above error somehow happened. Sorry again!

---

-----------------
Ok, so this is now a *triple post*. Sorry about that as well.

But from the looks of it then, if you try to post again, after already making a post with no new replies, it just gets added to the end of your previous message? Well that's kinda neat I guess, and cuts down on double post spam and things. And when I was editing the first time, it must has changed to reply rather than edit, due to the 10 mins passing.

[Charon]

We deactivate some accounts if they don't post in a year or two. Some rules were when we were private. Most members planned on making the required posts. So we may have suggested within 100 days.

But right now, people came back after not posting for a long time. But it is the circumstances of life right now. So we are trying to not turn people away whom are back for help.

k?

[Igloo]

We deactivate some accounts if they don't post in a year or two. Some rules were when we were private. Most members planned on making the required posts. So we may have suggested within 100 days.

But right now, people came back after not posting for a long time. But it is the circumstances of life right now. So we are trying to not turn people away whom are back for help.

k?

Ok understood. Thanks for clearing that up.

As the lovely Charon has already stated, RC stands for re$e@rch ch£m1cal (we have to speak in code like this so that certain terms don't throw up this site as a suggestion on search engines).

Not sure whether you have heard the term before, but RCs were exactly that, ch3ms intended for research only by lab professionals that existed in a legal grey area. Companies managed to sell them openly, and avoiding prosecution, by marking them with the label "Not for human consumption" . Obviously the users did just that, but they managed to get hold of them via a legal loophole. Some were sold under the "intention" that they were to be used as other things, such as incense and b@th s@lts.

As Charon has also advised, many really good people died as a result of an open market of incredibly powerful dr*gs. At one point, there might have been a dozen new subst@nc3s being released per week. And as they were untested on humans, until people into RCs purchased them, there was obviously no data how safe or how dangerous any given ch3m1cal was , and the users became the guinea pigs for testing these subst@nc3s out.

My personal history with RCs mainly involved the use of b3nz0d1@zep1nes that were being sold through these sites. Some were old b3nz0s discovered by pharm@ceut1cal companies years before but just never made it to market, and some were completely new b3nz0s.

The majority of the deaths involved increasingly powerful st1mul@nts that were being released, to which many good people became add1ct3d. And as you may have already guessed, as there were no prior human testing, in many cases doctors were helpless because they had no prior data to refer to on how to deal with add1cti0n to these completely new, very complex, set of subst@nc3s.

Many countries changed their laws and banned RCs altogether, others tightened up their regulations, and some carried on as they were. But yes, the point is, the world was going through a somewhat underground pandemic in which people were being k1lled, injured or becoming @dd1ct3d to increasingly dangerous untested subst@nc3s.

I hope this sums it up for you and hopefully you will have gained some insight into what some newspapers were comparing to the Wild West of days gone by.

Yeah, sorry. I'm already somewhat familiar with RCs, but my brain just didn't process the acronym right at first. I thought RCs were much more of a newer trend though. Read about them a lot over on Reddit. Didn't realize ordering this stuff has been happening for a long, long time now.

I don't get involved in them myself, but one thing I know is that you've got to be careful about unknowingly receiving fake m3ds with them added.

Like you said, some can be very potent stuff, especially when you're expecting something else.

[Igloo]

Igloo, as I was typing that last post I had a feeling you would have at least heard about them, at the height of their popularity they were constantly in the news (and not for good reasons). You'll soon get used to the way we communicate, the coded writing and the abbreviations.

You did right by asking though - if there's something you're not sure about, don't be afraid to ask questions. That's how you learn things, and the more you speak to someone, the more familiar you will become with them. It's a friendly site.

I was involved in the RC scene between 2009 and 2016 when our government banned the use of P$ych0@ctive subst@nc3s, but the scene was already going strong before that too. It had been an underground scene for quite some time, but thanks to the internet it became hugely popular.

Take care

Thanks mate. You too.

Now that you mention it though, I was wondering about the "Reputation" points users have. I searched the help articles and couldn't find anything. Is this only available for more senior members or something? I'm assuming it's a way to +rep other users' posts?

I was wondering as I would have done for you, if I could have figured out how. lol

[Charon]

Ok, if u have the ability to rate another's post, please don't give negative ratings to people. We shall handle that. It can scare members that everyone might have the ability to rate another. Our first two weeks, we had a fine lad come on. And within a week his Roid meds came in and he was giving all the staff negative reviews for our profiles and whatever. He got a couple more chances but he got the boot.

It was hurtful to the people whom found a negative rating from a drug addled brain under their forum name.

Just sayin. We give ratings to encourage you all. Have glorious weekends.

[Igloo]

I'm not sure if it works before you reach 50 posts, I can't quite remember ha. I know that I can rate things though, and have added positive rep points for others.

If you can do it, here's how to do it:

Right at the bottom of the post in question, on the same line where you get the options for Reply, Quote, Report and Warn (on the right hand side), on that very same line, but on the left hand side, there are options for PM (which I know for a fact you can't do until 50 posts), Find, and Rate.

If you want to rate anyone's posts, simply click on 'Rate' and choose whether it's positive, neutral or negative, then add any comments if you want to.

Like I say though, I'm not sure if this ability comes at 50 posts just like the PM ability.

Hope this helps.

Here's what I see: imgur(dot)com/a/NhDRJuX

So yep, no PM or Rate options yet, but thanks for explaining! Also, noticed you mention a "Warn" option too - what does that one do, as that's missing also?

And am I correct that rule #2 means you can't post proper links? But that the modified Imgur link above would be ok? Perhaps Charon could help answer that one.

Sorry for all the questions! But it's very appreciated. Thanks.

[Charon]

Perfect, Sand. Thank you. It is just a hot link goes right to g00g;e. and once a hot link knocked out the forum for a tad bit.

If you make a mistake, just post and I shall fix it. Or PM me if you have fifty posts. I still type full links by error. I should really ban myself.

The warnings: Only we can give them out. The staff and one Pioneer Member can also warn. You don't want a warning. Most whom get them do not last. They usually dissipate when u have made your welcome thread. Or stopped over posting or talking words that will get the attention of LE.

Elsewise, don't worry so much. These are such stressful times, we don't want undue stress on any of us. If u make a legit mistake, it is not the end of the world.

Just don't give up our vendors info. That crosses the line. But we can be very reasonable.

[Igloo]

Ok awesome. Thanks for helping again.

Although unfortunately, I posted a link previously without blocking it out. The post in question (post #54 in the thread): hxxps://www.ioplist.org/showthread.php?tid=4090&pid=137811#pid137811

I only realised it was an issue later on when I saw another poster mentioning it. And the rules say "Please do not make repeat copy posts or Spam the forum with any links", so I thought that meant it was just spamming that was an issue.

Perhaps you could fix that post for me Sharon? Sorry about that!

[Charon]

I got it. Thank u for letting me know. I think that site was safe but we should all stay in the habit of being oh so cautious with all this Fresh Hell going on around us. Thank u Igloo.