Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
As expected, a whitewash for Hillary's crimes
#1
Front page news today, james comfey, fbi director, said there was no evidence she "intentionally" mishandled classified or secret documents. And that other countries "may" have accessed the server, which they did of course. Any ordinary citizen would have been prosecuted and sent to jail for this. Does anyone remember general petraeus? He got sacked from his job at the military for mishandling "sensitive" material which is much lower than classified and much lower than secret. They were going to do more to him until hillary's dirty laundry came up and they knew they better back off petraeus to protect hill.

Obomber once again hides behind flunkies to do his dirty work just as I predicted. No charges for crimes that could land the person life in prison (if it was you or I).
Reply
#2
Now we get to test the collective intelligence of our electorate... the FBI just disclosed many instances of Hillary Clinton's gross negligence.

Sound like someone you would want at the head of your government?
Reply
#3
Not I. But you can consider this 'whitewash' as you put it, just another Whitewater. Interesting scandal names for someone who is not very clean!
Reply
#4
(07-07-2016, 07:43 PM)margie11 Wrote: Not I.  But you can consider this 'whitewash' as you put it, just another Whitewater.  Interesting scandal names for someone who is not very clean!

Hey, when you're on the team, you can get away with murder. Just ask the Clinton's Big Grin
Reply
#5
Cricket I have missed you thoughts on these matters.

Seems there is not one sector of the GOV that has not been compromised.

What she did many others have been prosecuted for, wait even much less.

She has put our national security out there to be understood my enemies.

The big question is, What did she have to HIDE? ...using her personal servers?

Probably the fact that she was shaking down big companies, wealthy individuals and foreign governments for money "donated" to her foundation.

Among other things. .....What a mess our country is in, supersedes regular politics, IMO.
Reply
#6
Very true and well said, linville. Remember (former) general petraeus? He was criminally prosecuted for much much less than what hill did. But he is not a political heavyweight in the ruling party so he got common man justice same as we might. Hill got a get out of jail free card, I wonder how much it cost her, or cost her donors? She has taken in hundreds of millions and that will open a lot of doors if you know where to put it. Or who did she promise a cushy job to? I'll take an honest lunatic or loudmouth over a slimy crook. Thats why I would have taken sanders or trump.

Obomber is openly campaigning for her, seems happy with whatever he got out of the deal.
Reply
#7
(07-10-2016, 12:44 AM)Grandote Wrote: I'll take an honest lunatic or loudmouth over a slimy crook. Thats why I would have taken sanders or trump.

Obomber is openly campaigning for her, seems happy with whatever he got out of the deal.

Be careful what you wish for. In the UK the lunatics have taken over the asylum following Brexit. Lots of people very angry with the "political elite", gave them a good kicking, but in the process totally screwed themselves.

I'm not surprised Obama is campaigning for Clinton - they worked together. Sanders is too far left for him, and Obama is hardly going to endorse Trump (or anyone from GOP).
Reply
#8
He didn't have to be out there on the hustings before she was even coronated, er I mean nominated. He must be really happy with the package promised him soon as he leaves office. Reagan had to settle for chump change like the 2 million he got for giving japan most favored nation status. Oh, I mean he got it for a speech he made, lol yeah right. Hitlery is making lots of those speeches and obomber will be making lots too, to lightly launder the bribes. Oh I mean the reward for a good speech. I keep using the wrong words.
Reply
#9
When it comes to speaking fees, look at one Tony Blair. You'd hope the verdict of the Chilcot Inquiry, which was utterly damning about Blair fixing the evidence to support the war with Iraq, would erase him from the world stage. But I suspect he will go on as normal. I would think one of the worst things a leader can do is take a nation into a war under a false pretext. General opinion seems to be he won't face jail, or even a court. The UK parliament might take action, but it is largely symbolic.
Reply
#10
(07-09-2016, 01:08 PM)Linville Wrote: Cricket I have missed you thoughts on these matters.

Seems there is not one sector of the GOV that has not been compromised.

What she did many others have been prosecuted for, wait even much less.

She has put our national security out there to be understood my enemies.

The big question is, What did she have to HIDE? ...using her personal servers?

Probably the fact that she was shaking down big companies, wealthy individuals and foreign governments for money "donated" to her foundation.

Among other things. .....What a mess our country is in, supersedes regular politics, IMO.


LOL Linville. I've been trying to lay low on these subjects lately. Could be me just being paranoid, but since I started talking about all the government is doing behind our backs to screw us, EVERYTHING in my life has gone bad, bad, bad. Could they be getting back at me for my big mouth? Probably not, but why chance it. I've got more than my share of bad things to deal with so just in case, I'm not gonna say much. Well, try anyway, but they give you soooo much to talk about. It's hard to zip it.

Be well my brother.

Da Bug
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)